A few days ago, Petron Corp. Philippines revealed that the alternative fuel, E10, had harmful effects on vehicles. Corrosion, which was pointed out as the main culprit that could pose severe threats to a car’s fuel and gas intake parts, were attributed to other factors such as the use of previous types of fuel and inferior replacement parts. This was what Department of Energy Secretary Angelo T. Reyes revealed in the light of the fear that the celebrated E10 fuel may be doing more harm than good for vehicles.
According to the DOE secretary as well, the purity of local ethanol was 99.8 percent, just above the 99.3-percent standard. This may seem like an answer but the number of car owners complaining about the E10 ethanol fuel may be something to consider as well. If the case were for just a couple of motorists, then this excuse could be accepted. However, that is just the thing; there are no definitive numbers to actually pinpoint if majority of car owners using the E10 fuel have indeed had problems with it.
Finally, the E10 ethanol fuel was claimed to likewise help clean fuel tanks. Now this seems contradicting if you tie it up with the motorist claims. If actual numbers of complainants can be shown, the actual judgment on whether the E10 is good or bad for cars can be adjudged. But for now, it has been a battle of opinion which is not resolving anything as far as this issue is concerned.
Image Courtesy: Petron Fuel Success
(Source) Philippine Daily Inquirer
Tags: alternative fuel, car owners, corrosion, culprit, department of energy, doe secretary, e10 ethanol, e10 fuel, energy secretary, ethanol fuel, excuse, fear, few days, fuel tanks, judgment, motorists, petron corp philippines, philippine daily inquirer, purity, replacement parts
1 user responded in this post
[...] low, low price of five hundred bucks American, and you too can strap an amalgamation of parts and gasoline on your back, leap ten feet in the air twice, and then take the thing off before it [...]